Thursday, December 18, 2008

Nightly Lucidity Part Two

This week has been rather busy, so that is why my title, Daily Dose, may appear to be a little misleading. My last class for the semester is this evening, so wish me luck and, in return, I will do my absolute best to maintain the merit of Daily Dose.

As some of you may already be aware, I have been practicing the so-called "art" of lucid dreaming. I've been constantly trying to improve my techniques in my approach in hope that I may appropriately and precisely grasp this "art". Half of the ease of a lucid dream can be achieved by what is done before the sleep process commences. For instance, beginners are advised to study their own hands right before going to sleep. The point of that is that the hand is the most commonly sighted extremity on one's own human body, unless they've been exceeding well above and beyond the recommended dosage of Enzyte or Viagra.


Feeling that I am no longer a beginner, I don't pay too much attention to what I see before I dream, but, instead, I try to focus more on what I hear. Hearing is a much more interpretive sense than seeing. I've realized that watching a movie or a television show before sleeping can be a very profound distraction. One may have unwanted repeats of scenes from the film within the dream. I'd hate to be in a perfect scenario in a dream, fully aware that I am dreaming and, right before I've obtained domination within my own dream world, I find myself trying to dodge bowling pins from Daniel Day-Lewis after he's told me he's been drinking my milkshake.


Once I realized that visual arts can compromise the lucid dreaming world, I began to listen to music and let it play into my dream. This can either be an aid or it can lead to the downfall of one's success in a lucid dream. For instance, I recently listened to Vampire Weekend before I went to bed. I really enjoy the album. However, I feel that the album created the tone within my dream. The light levels were effected, colors appeared to be similar to those which would appear in a film containing Vampire Weekend's music and the people within my dream all looked like the typical purchasers of Vampire Weekend albums. If I were to listen to a Lil Wayne album before I went to bed, I'd probably find myself in a wanna-be ghetto with a bunch of whiny wanna-be thugs and caught in a would-be drive-by if it weren't for all the Fisher Price guns firing wanna-be bullets at me.



I tried a few other albums of modern music of all different genres and my theory proved consistent. Modern music has a deep impact on one's lucid dreaming experience. It causes limits to exist within the dream. I, then, decided to listen to Chopin before I went to bed. I put on his E Minor Piano Concerto. My dream, that night, was much more versatile. I felt much more in control of my atmosphere and the people within my dream were much more diverse than prior dreams had been. I feel that the reason for this (and I've tried it with other classical music to help prove my theory true) is that classical music is often timeless. For example, if you watch a movie that takes place in 2000 BC, the musical score is often within the classical genre. You can also find movies about the future, such as 2001: A Space Odyssey (I know that would've been seven years ago. Let me prove my point), and hear Richard Strauss's Sprach Zarathustra.


I've now been listening to classical music every night before sleep and I feel I'm reaching a much more advanced stage. I've begun entering a dream where I had left off the last time I awoke. I'm able to fly within the dream, I feel a constant sense that everyone within my dreams admires me for something I'm not understanding. Perhaps it's modesty, an attribute I do not have in my waking life. I'm finding myself in the same place when I enter a dream, but everything is developing very rapidly and I feel that it is my own dream domain being built for me. I awake feeling much more proud of myself than I usually do, which is not very much. I feel as though I'm accomplishing something greater than could ever be accomplished in my waking life. I also awake with much more motivation to get out of bed in the morning. I want to accomplish as much as I possibly can so that I can make time "fly" as fast as it possibly can so that it will only feel like seconds until my next dream. I feel like a king there. I wish that more people could practice this, so we can reach the stage of shared dreaming, so I could show my domain to others and possibly see theirs as well.

It's not that I suffer from delusions of grandeur, but I feel that, having your dream world be a world that makes you feel like a king or queen within a utopia is one of the greatest all-encompassing sensations you can experience. Try it out and I hope to see you soon.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Wrestling Rachmaninoff



Before I begin, I must admit to stealing this headline from the title of a scene from the film Shine. I just couldn't think of a more appropriate headline. As many of you may know, I'm a classically trained pianist. Many of you probably don't know that my inspiration for pursuing this was the Russian composer, Sergei Vasilyevich Rachmaninoff. Particularly, his Piano Concerto No. 3 in D Minor, Op. 43 was the very inspiration that motivated my ambition to take every step I've ever taken in piano playing. I first heard it in the car with my father several years ago and, if it weren't for his choice to play that CD at that precise moment in history, it's quite possible this passion would have faded into oblivion. Dad, if you're reading this, thank you for that. Everything you do is significant. The piano has been the only effective form of therapy for me.

Though I've never actually considered the possibility that I'd ever be able to play this piece, I purchased the sheet music for it from a Connecticut music store about six years ago. Since the day I became serious about playing piano, I learned pieces I never fathomed I'd be able to play. I've played over thirty pieces by Beethoven, including his "Pathetique" Sonata in C Minor, "Appassionata" Sonata in F Minor and I've even composed a series of variations on his very popular "Moonlight" Sonata in C# Minor. I've played more Chopin than any other composer. I've played his entire set of 28 Préludes, about 15 of his nocturnes, 3 of the four Scherzi (the first one drove me insane), 4 Valses, his first Sonata, about 20 Mazurkas, a few of his Polonaises (including Grand Polonaise Brillante) and several other works. The rest of my repertoire consists of works by Mozart, J. S. Bach, C. Ph. E. Bach, Grieg, Satie, Scriabin, Liszt, Brahms, Granados, Prokofiev, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninoff and many others.

Quite recently, I've been attempting to play excerpts of the first movement of his third concerto and, I'm being completely honest when I say this, anyone who is able to perform this piece in its entirety is not human. This is, by far, the most difficult thing to achieve in the entire world of music. The cadenza in his first movement is described in many piano books as being "taxing to the pianist". I'd hate to know what country these people came from. If they think of this as just being taxed, I'll have to go to Hallmark and reserve every sympathy card for them. If you have or haven't an interest in classical music, I definitely recommend listening to this piece. If you have trouble finding it, send me an e-mail at DaveCB@optonline.net

Thursday, December 11, 2008

The Unintentionally Hilarious vs. The Socially Retarded

I just love unintentionally hilarious people. They are a very interesting specimen. I'm not sure whether to idolize them or sympathize for them. I spend hours of every day thinking of ways to get a five second laugh out of someone. It's worth it. In the world of the unintentionally hilarious person, they can keep people laughing for hours, even when they are no longer present. They don't even have to try, which makes it at least 7.63 times as funny. That's just a rough estimation. Is laughing at/with a person of this genus considered a mockery in God's eyes? When my cluttered mind poses a question of this sort, I often try to put myself inside the shoes of the subject. In this case, even trying to hypothetically be in the shoes of an unintentionally hilarious person is quite difficult. I must keep in mind that I have to keep out of mind the acknowledgment that I am hilarious by my very existence alone. I've realized that it is almost impossible, at my level of mental dexterity, to achieve this. Until that improves, I will just assume that it is not considered (by God) to be a mockery of the unintentionally hilarious, because I feel it is inevitable to laugh. If I discover that this is a mockery, I will immediately refrain from all laughter unless it is consensual. If sympathy is owed to the unintentionally hilarious, I will start, from this very moment, to store all of the little bit of sympathy I have for the entire world and reserve it for these people.

There is another specimen, which many may consider to be identical to the first, but I have known since the moment I obtained linguistic capabilities, that the two are extremely different. This specimen I'm referring to is the population of socially retarded people. These people are not hilarious, not entertaining and I honestly feel that they are the largest threat to humanity and the well-being of the universe. Many of these people are lonely, unless they've paired with another of their kind. What makes these people different from the anti-socialites is that they, despite their deficiencies, love to attempt to socialize. I had an encounter with one of the socially retarded the other day. I won't go into great detail, for I'm slowly attempting to erase the memory from my mind, heart and soul, all of which are still recovering. Many of the socially retarded suffer from a lack of positive attention, which I have theorized to be the cause of their condition. Perhaps their parents were neglectful or were not paying attention to their children's development and/or were overprotective, which caused their social skills to be severely delayed. It's similar to how different a child's fluency will be in a language when you compare a child who has studied the language since the age of 4 to a person who began studying the language during post-adolescence. Anyhow, in my encounter the other day, I was stuck in a conversation with a socially retarded man, about three years older than I. He was friendly, but it was clearly obvious that this man had had no friends... ever. He was asking me about my cellphone. He asked me four questions, one hundred times each. Since his impact has been embedded in my mind for possibly all of eternity, I can quote him to every word of this. About two hours into the conversation, he began to get a little personal and said "Hey. Dave. Maybe we can hang out sometime. You should give me your number. I should get your number. We can go to parties. I don't go to parties, but you look like you go to parties. You go to parties, right? You look like you go to parties. Ha! I knew it. You go to parties." I really enjoyed his shock with his "Ha!" when my facial expression had not changed at all during the entire duration of the conversation. In addition to being socially retarded, I'm safely assuming he also suffers from what I like to call GED (Glance Exchange Delusions). I feel as though I had been mentally raped by this person and I am insistent upon having charges pressed against him. I'll be suing for the amount of twenty-four hours added back to my life. Though I must have lost about three hours of my life from this person, I feel I will need eight hours for every one he stole from me. To a normal person, I could have explained all of what I had explained in less than ten minutes. This man was not uneducated scholastically, nor did he seem to have a scholastic learning disability, but I'm assuming whatever scholarly attributes he had were diluted due to the excitation he underwent after receiving any form of social interaction, a delicacy on his home planet.

I've never had a problem with people taking their time. Just don't take mine. When one takes their time to do something, they at least have the goal of achievement. When one takes my time, I achieve nothing but a new blog posting to write. I am not enjoying this either. If you're reading this and you find yourself having a conversation tomorrow with a guy named Dave and he doesn't smile at all, shut the fuck up, go home and read this again!

TODAY'S SCOREBOARD

UH 1 - SR 0

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Oscar, Greg and the Brown Bubble Ride to Schizoslovakia

Due to a recent plunge through the abyss of abuse, I was unable to write anything yesterday. Instead of providing all of you (perhaps that would make three people, including me, myself and mom) with an elaborate apology, I will write something today inconsistent with my prior nine postings.

There are actually a few topics I was thinking of today. The first is that of schizophrenia. A frequently used colloquial term to describe a severely crazy person is "schizo", which, of course, is short for "schizophrenic", as I'm sure most of you are all well aware. Though this term is often used incorrectly, as it usually doesn't appropriately modify the subject (the subject usually not displaying symptoms of an actual schizophrenic), I don't believe linking "crazy" to "schizophrenic" as interchangeable adjectives is a smart move. Many people, throughout the past and the present have become outcasts, solely based on one thing: their differences from the norm. It has clearly been documented that people have destroyed entire cultures based on their religion, their skin color, their traditions, etc. In the United States, equality, to an extent, has slowly gotten closer and closer to achievement in some aspects, while getting farther away, in the very attempt to achieve it. Equality, by no means, exists yet. Either something is equal or it isn't. You couldn't say that seven partially equals one or that, since Abraham Lincoln freed the twos through sixes, seven is closer to equaling one now than it had in the past.

I still see racism everyday. I see it in both extremes. I see blacks who hate whites. I see whites who hate blacks. I see blacks who hate other shades of blacks. I see whites who hate tans. I could continue this list for years. I also see whites who will go out of their way to be nicer to a black person because that person is black and vice versa. Slavery doesn't exist anymore in the United States, at least not on a scale that it had years ago. My generation, as well as my parents' generation, generally realize how ignorant racial discrimination is. I'm proud to be part of this generation. I will not like a white person because he or she is white. At the same time, I will not hesitate to dislike a man or woman of another race if they have wronged me in some way, for fear that I will be accused of being racist. I'll hate everyone before I pick and choose races to like and dislike.

As time has proceeded, we now see past cases of racial and cultural oppression as a catastrophe. This tells us that the ways of past generations were generally ignorant and immoral. At least when I see a car that has a "JESUS" emblem on the right side and a swastika on the left, I know the person is clearly what many people would refer to as a "schizo". Worshiping one Jew and wishing an end to the rest never made any sense to me.

Basically, what I wanted to establish is the fact that many people have been and continue to be oppressed because of their differences. Racial discrimination is one of thousands of examples. I wanted to focus more on the portrayal of schizophrenics by many and how it differs from mine. In the same way whites felt it was okay to use blacks as slaves, people use schizophrenics as icons of crazy people. This an example of a superior-inferior relationship. It has been said that, genetically, every person on this planet is over 99% similar to any other person on the planet. What this means is that, no matter how different attributes may seem inside or outside a person, less than only one percent of that person is different from you, even when the person has a psychological "disorder" such as schizophrenia.

Imagine two people. One is green. One is orange. The green person has grown up in a society that has only exposed him or her to things that are green. The orange only knows orange things. Neither society has ever interacted with anything outside their color.



One day, the orange person (we'll call him Oscar) said to himself "Hey. You know what? I'm fed up with all of this orange nonsense. There has got to be something else out there, not necessarily better, but something else and I will never know unless I look for it." Oscar couldn't leave right away. He spent the first week arguing with all of his stubborn orange family and all his disappointed friends. His orange grandmother asked "What do you want to leave for? There's nothing else out there. And if there is, I don't wanna know about it. Everything you need is right here. Are we not good enough for you? Stay." Don't get me wrong. Oscar and I are very well-acquainted and I know he loves his grandmother very much, but he was just too darn curious not to leave and explore. He spent the next four days acquiring all the appropriate documents needed to obtain an Orangean passport and the next seventy-three months waiting everyday at the mailbox for it.

Once Oscar received his passport, he hugged and kissed his family and friends goodbye and set off in hope of exploring a foreign and friendly land. He was hoping for anything that wasn't orange. He had never seen anything that wasn't orange. Flying over the orange ocean under the orange clouds in the orange sky, he wondered if and when he would find anything. He decided to fall asleep and hoped that, when he awoke, he would find a new place, a place that wasn't orange. He awoke several hours later on a beach. It turned out that his bubble had crashed into another bubble... a green bubble...

He exited his flying bubble, pushed the sides together until it contracted to the size of a gumball and placed it in his pocket. He wiped off the excess slime that bubbles had always left on people after travel. It was more than he had ever seen before since the most he had ever traveled was within the boundaries of Orangea. After all the slime was off, he looked up and saw a person staring at him in bewilderment. Oscar soon realized nothing around him was orange anymore. It was a color he had never seen before. This color, of course, was green. Oscar appeared bug-eyed in shock for a moment, but instantly smiled the biggest smile he had ever smiled and put his hand out to shake the green person's hand. The green man did not understand this gesture, but looked very curious. He looked around to see if anyone else was watching and he walked a little closer to Oscar. Oscar gently grabbed the green man's hand and shook it. "My name is Oscar. What's your name?" The green man smiled and replied "My name is Greg." Oscar became a little shocked. He understood Greg, but the way he spoke sounded as if he had been gargling milk. This was odd to Oscar, but he was happy that he had found something new. They spent several hours on the beach, talking with one another, appreciating one another's likenesses and differences. Greg had always been a curious one, as well. Greg showed Oscar how to greet people in his land, Greenada (Greenland was already taken by a real-life example). This was to gently tap right feet together.

Greg's family members had been spying on this whole situation for several minutes before they approached Oscar and Greg with furious anger. They began to scream at both of them, more at Oscar, for they did not want to understand or accept his existence. Oscar found it difficult to understand loud yells with the whole gargling sound. This instantly distanced the two colors and created a language barrier. Suddenly, a green man with a green high-hat urged everyone to be silent, looked at Oscar, who was beyond frightened, and asked him for his reasons for being in his country. Oscar gave him a twenty minute speech about how he always dreamed of another place different from his own and how he was very fond of this new color he had never seen before and how he had always known there was more to life than just orange and he was so happy to be right. This high-hat wearing man was the Lime Minister of the country and was actually exactly the same way Oscar was when he was a child, but his family would not allow leaving. The Lime Minister smiled, pleasingly, and said "Welcome to Greenada!"

It took Oscar a while to get used to everything. He fell in love with a girl named Geraldine and they had a brown child named Beth. Oscar and Greg became best friends and decided to be partners in exploration. The four of them set off for Orangea. It took a while for everyone there to accept Geraldine or Greg. It especially took a long time for them to get used to Beth, but they knew she was their family now. Eventually, people from Orangea were going to Greenada and people from Greenada were going to Orangea, exchanging ideas, goods, customs, etc. Oscar and Greg spent the next few years seeking new land and they found lands of all different colors including purple, yellow, red, blue and many others. Pretty soon, every country had people of every color and all different mixes of colors.

There was one land, however, that Oscar and Greg had never visited and were never prepared for what they had encountered when they landed in Schizoslovakia... Upon exiting their brown bubble, which was the result of the fusing of both bubbles, they noticed a life form they had never encountered before. It had no color and it had no consistent shape. They were like amoebas, constantly shape-shifting. Oscar and Greg, in any other situation, would have reached out their hands and feet with a warm introduction. However, since the Schizoslovakians were so different, they assumed they were severely ill and decided to take the entire population of Schizoslovakians and placed them in a hospital in Orangea, where they could get better. Since the doctors had no idea what to do, they assumed the entire race was crazy and were all suffering from a terminal disorder.

Not all stories have happy endings. Perhaps I took that way too far and I suppose I might have seemed to have exaggerated a bit, but, in reality, this is no exaggeration at all. With every form of life, there is inevitably some form of evolution, not just in the physical, but in the behavioral. The behavioral evolves much more rapidly than the physical. In this case, discrimination is undergoing a new evolution. I don't believe it's better than previous steps throughout the history of the evolution of discrimination, but it is slightly different from previous types. In this case, many people believe that schizophrenics are undoubtedly insane, because they have an incorrect perception of the world. Who's to say they're wrong? Maybe they're the only ones who see the right way. Maybe we're both right. How would we ever know and who could ever rightfully claim the throne of judgment on the issue? Someone who feels that anything different from them is inferior. There's the answer. When someone cannot comprehend something, they should indulge in the positive essences of life and try to comprehend instead of simply writing all differences off as inferiority. We are all separate human beings. We're all individuals. What's wrong with having our own individual realities?

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Parallel Synchronized Randomness

It turns out that I'll probably be discussing film in most of my postings. For any of you who have allergies to reading about film, you may be excused. I wanted to discuss a fictional term used to describe a nonfictional phenomenon, known as Parallel Synchronized Randomness. If you've never seen the Michel Gondry film, La Science des Rêves (The Science of Sleep), you've probably never heard this term before. In the film, Gael García Bernal's character, Stéphane Miroux, has had a problem with merging his dreams into real life and vice versa. He uses the term, Parallel Synchronized Randomness, to describe a rare phenomenon that occurs when two people share a certain thought pattern simultaneously and randomly. Though the term may have been created by the scriptwriters for the film, the phenomenon definitely exists.


Here's an example. My sister, Becky, and I have these odd conversations that transform into giggles and silliness. I've noticed this on numerous occasions, but I can remember one example clearly. During Thanksgiving of this year, my sister and I were giggling and being silly (we were at that point in the odd conversation) and, simultaneously and completely randomly, we each said "Bobby!" with the same tone and facial expression. I felt as though I were having an aneurysm after that, since I was attempting to calculate the odds of what had happened. I still haven't figured it out. This has happened before, mostly with my sister, but, occasionally with a select few others. It's definitely one of the most bizarre phenomena I've ever witnessed firsthand, which says a lot, since I've witnessed firsthand about 3,876,342 other phenomena in my life. If this ever happens to you or if it has ever happened to you, please e-mail me your experience at DaveCB@optonline.net

Also, for those of you who like being exposed to films that challenge the mind, I definitely recommend this film. For those of you unfamiliar with Michel Gondry's work, he is also the director of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I posted a clip of La Science des Rêves (Don't worry. It's almost entirely in English) right underneath this, so you can gain some more exposure to some of what I just discussed. Enjoy!




Friday, December 5, 2008

How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two Days Later


I had previously and briefly mentioned the film, Waking Life, within a post about A Scanner Darkly. When I had first seen the film, I was astonished as I heard what Richard Linklater's character, the Pinball Playing Guy, had said to Wiley Wiggins' character. He basically discussed how he had read an essay by Philip K. Dick about an experience he had had that related to an award-winning novel he had written previously, called Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said, which Dick claimed to have written very fast, as if he had been channeling all the events at once. I decided to read the essay for myself.

It was explained that, after the completion of Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said, Philip K. Dick, on Christmas Day of 1970, had met a girl named Kathy. Her boyfriend's name was Jack. Dick later found out that Kathy was a drug dealer. Now, in the novel, there was a character named Kathy who was involved in the criminal underground and she had had a husband named Jack. In the novel, it turns out that Kathy was working for the police and she had been having a relationship with a police inspector. Dick had become friends with the real-life Kathy and he claimed to have been discouraging her from dealing drugs and insisted that she would get caught if she had continued. One day, as the two were entering a restaurant, Kathy had stopped short and refused to go any farther because a police inspector, whom Dick knew, was seated inside the restaurant and Kathy had explained to Dick that she was having a relationship with him.

Though Dick had written the novel in 1970, it hadn't been published until 1974. In that year, Dick spoke to his priest about a scene towards the end of the novel, in which a character named Felix Buckman, a high-ranking police general, converses with a black stranger at an all-night gas station. Dick said that, as he was describing the scene, the priest became agitated and told him that he was describing a scene from the Book of Acts, as in the Book of Acts from the bible, which was written around 50 AD. The priest then told him that the man who meets the black stranger on the road, in the Book of Acts, was named Philip, which, of course, is Dick's first name. The priest then told Dick, whom had never read the Book of Acts, to go home and read the Book of Acts for himself and so he did. At first, he had just scanned through to find the scene that related to the one he had told the priest. After finding it and reading it, he was stunned by the similarities the scene in his stories had with the scene from the Book of Acts. In the Book of Acts, there is a scene in which Felix, a high-ranking Roman official, helps a Nubian and baptizes him.



After this, Dick tried to find other similarities. The main character in his novel was named Jason. He then looked in the index to see if any Jason had been mentioned in the entire bible. There was only one result and that was in the Book of Acts. In Dick's novel, Jason was a fugitive hiding in a person's house. In the Book of Acts, Jason was harboring a fugitive in his home, making this an inversion from the Book of Acts to the novel. In the essay, Dick's reaction to this was "-- as if the mysterious Spirit responsible for all this was having a sort of laugh about the whole thing".

After seeing so many resemblances, it became clear to Dick that this was not just a series of coincidences. There were too many. Knowing that they was some significance behind this beyond his comprehension, he tried to think of a theory as to why this would be happening or how it would be happening but, sadly, he couldn't. It became frustrating for him that he had gone his whole life without reading the Book of Acts, wrote a book 1920 years after the Book of Acts, which somehow, unintentionally had remarkable similarities to it. The characters' names being the same is one thing. But having the characters' names be the same, as well as their positions and situations being very similar? That's more than coincidence.

Dick then went on to explain that, two months before he had written the essay, which was in 1978, he had seen a black man, whom he didn't know (making him a black stranger). At first, Dick had thought this man was trying to steal his car. On impulse, Dick confronted the man and asked if he needed any help. The man explained that he was out of gas and needed money. Dick claimed that, prior to this, he never lent a helping hand to a stranger in this type of position, but, for some reason, this night, he reached into his wallet and gave the guy money. Dick then left the stranger and went to go back into his house, but then realized that this stranger was nowhere near a gas station so he went back, found the guy and drove him to an all-night gas station miles away. He then helped this stranger get gas and brought him back to his car. Dick hadn't realized it while he was doing any of this, but it later became clear to him that, not only was he retelling scenes from the Book of Acts; he was reliving a scene, as well. He then remembered how the priest had told him that the name of the character in the Book of Acts who had met the black stranger on the road was named Philip.

There is more that Dick had to say, but gets very deeply opinionated. I just wanted to share this. If it's all true and not a hoax that Dick created to cause people to believe he was channeling events from the spiritual world, I think this is possibly the most compelling true story I've ever heard in my life.

"But... How Do I Get to Where I Want to Be???"


This is going to be a short one, so enjoy it while it lasts. What is the obsession with GPS systems? If you don't know where you're going, you shouldn't be driving.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The Wrestler


Darren Aronofsky, the independent film director of such films as Π, Requiem for a Dream and The Fountain, has a new movie called The Wrestler, which has a scheduled limited release on December 17th. I have absolutely no interest in amateur or professional "wrestling", but Aronofsky has never ceased to amaze me with his work, especially with Requiem for a Dream. He is definitely one of few actual visionary directors in the 21st century and there always seems to be a profound message behind all his creations. I'm definitely planning to see this when it comes out and I really hope I like it. I don't like losing faith in directors. I've found myself doing that quite frequently during the past few years. Guy Ritchie, for example, made Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch, which were both amazing films, but then he had to go and make that retarded movie with Madonna, Swept Away. I wish he had swept that under his bed and never showed it to anyone. Because of that film, I was beyond skeptical when I heard that RocknRolla was a must-see.

I saw the trailer for The Wrestler when I saw Danny Boyle's Slumdog Millionaire and I was impressed. I usually dislike Mickey Rourke, but I feel that there was a significant reason behind him being cast for the lead role. I also never thought much about Marisa Tomei, the female co-star of the film, aside from her attractiveness and her ridiculously slow aging process. After I saw Sidney Lumet's film, Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, I realized that she is a very capable actress. I've posted the trailer underneath this for all of you to view.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Nightly Lucidity


Off and on, throughout the past few years of my life, I've been practicing the "art" of lucid dreaming. I'm not a very religiously-oriented person. However, I am not an atheist or an agnostic. I believe there is a God and I believe that there is definitely something beyond each of us besides the physical.

I put off lucid dreaming for the past two years or so and I just started again about a week ago. In that time, I've had a couple of dreams that were really intense. I had one dream where I was speaking with my grandmother, who passed away several years ago. In the dream, she had vocally reminded me of times I had spent with her during childhood, with details I never would have recalled otherwise. She had reminded me of a time when I was very little and my grandfather, who has been dead even longer than she has, let me sit on his lap while he'd drive. I don't think I've ever thought about that since the moment it had happened.

In another dream, there was an entire group of people, all openly discussing that we were all dreaming together. It was as if I went to a party and everyone who was there had just won the lottery. Everyone was so excited and smiling. One of the guys in my dream was Gary Oldman, whom I never think about unless I'm watching a movie that he's in. In this dream, Gary Oldman gathered all of the people (about 20) into a circle inside a grocery store. He then proceeded to explain the rules of this game called "Supermarket Shootout" for all those who hadn't played before. I was one of the people who hadn't. The guy next to me, an overly ecstatic guy, told me that it was his fourth time. Gary Oldman then explained that the object of the game was to shoot and kill as many people as you could, but, in order to win, you'd have to be the only person left. Gary Oldman was just the referee, I suppose. We then, somehow, all had automatic weapons in our hands. I don't recall ever picking one up. It was then explained to me, by the happy guy that he was so ecstatic because he could shoot people as much as he wanted without any real penalty. This, then, became oddly intriguing to me. He had a point. He then told me that, if I shoot someone, they might disappear because they can't handle the simulation of being shot and that they associate that simulation with actually being shot in real life, which causes them to wake up. After we dispersed throughout the supermarket and found our hiding spots, everyone began to fire their weapons, including me, of course. I figured I should probably take advantage of an opportunity like this when it arises. I remember about half the people disappeared within the first few moments of the game. Seeing people get shot looked awfully like the way it looks in real life, with the exception of the disappearances. I then got shot a bunch of times and I woke up. I woke up wondering if all of that was in my head or if I actually found the location of the infamous dream game, "Supermarket Shootout" along with these 20 other dreamers, including Gary Oldman.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

A New Danny Boyle Masterpiece

The last two films I saw in theaters were Quantum of Solace and Zack and Miri Make a Porno. They were what I would refer to as "mediocre". I group films into three categories: "Crap", "Mediocre" and "Masterpiece". None of these contain any subcategories. If a movie sucks, it's crap. If it doesn't suck, but doesn't really challenge me in any way or shake me, it's mediocre. When a movie "does something" for me, that's when I consider it a masterpiece. I've literally seen thousands of films of all different genres and I can only think of, at most, ten that I would group into the "Masterpiece" field. Only moments ago, I saw the new Danny Boyle film called Slumdog Millionaire. This definitely belongs in that field. If you've been finding yourself hesitant to see a movie in theaters lately because most movies now fall into the "Crap" group, let me persuade you, though you won't need much.

Slumdog Millionaire is a gem. It's the type of film that has never had a precedent set for it, because it is the precedent for an entirely new genre within filmmaking. Films this powerful only come around maybe once every five or ten years. I'm not one to discuss the plot while trying to encourage people to view a movie, but I will say that no one can possibly be the same person after seeing this. There are many strong messages throughout this film and it is definitely as vital for any person to see this as it is for a Catholic priest to read the bible. That is not an exaggeration. See this or you will forever live your life much more similarly to the life you have right now.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Wireless CD Transmitter?


I've been thinking about a possible solution to a recurring dilemma many people have accrued with the recent (or not so recent) advent of virtually all music being converted to MP3. Almost every person I know below the age of 60 has some form of an MP3 player, whether it's an iPod, a Zune, a Sansa, a Zen, etc. The MP3 player, in my opinion, is one of the best inventions within the music lovers' realm. Some might argue that it's terrible because it's destroying the music industry and all the record companies are taking tremendous dives because of the MP3 player's encouragement toward illegal music downloads. If record companies didn't charge $17.99 for a CD that cost $16.99 to make, perhaps the illegal downloading would have taken a dive as well. I believe that the MP3 player serves as a major part of the change in today's society. Take a walk through Manhattan during rush hour tomorrow and think back ten years. If there is one difference that sticks out more than any other, it's that a very high percentage of these people tomorrow will have headphones in their ears. This has completely revitalized the way people go to work in the morning, it changes the way people work out, it changes the way people walk, the way people read, relax, go to the bathroom, etc.

But what about the people who drive? It's okay for some people. Some cars still have tape decks, so it is possible to use a cassette adapter to connect the MP3 player to the car, but the listener is limited to cassette quality. They've also developed the very unpopular FM Transmitter. Honestly, I have never heard anyone say anything positive about any one of these. For any of you who are unfamiliar with an FM Transmitter, it's basically a device that allows a driver to wirelessly transmit a signal from an audio device through a corresponding radio station on an FM band. One problem with this is that the FM station has to be of a certain level of "fuzziness". Another problem with this is that FM reception changes with every mile travelled and is prone to interference. The only solution I agree with is the AUX (or auxiliary) feature , which allows one to connect a 3.5mm plug into the headphone jack of an audio device (such as the MP3 player) and then connect another 3.5 mm plug (which would be on the end of the cord connected to the first plug) into a 3.5mm port somewhere in the car, which tunes directly through the speakers in the car. This is by far the greatest solution so far for drivers.

But what do people do if they don't have a tape deck or AUX port? Should they have to settle for an FM Transmitter, which sucks and could cost anywhere from $39.99 to over $119.99? That's not very fair. I'm not an engineer in any way, shape or form, but I often get ideas that I think might possibly be worthy of submitting to engineers. By now, most cars have CD players. Why hasn't anyone thought of a Wireless CD Transmitter? What if there could be a CD with a built-in wireless or Bluetooth chip with a corresponding wireless or Bluetooth receiver that could attach to an iPod or other MP3 players? The problem with the wireless FM Transmitters is not the wireless. It's the FM. I believe that this idea would work very well and would be very profitable. At this point, I don't wish or expect to see a dime from this if it's invented. I'll just have the satisfaction of knowing that they finally provided auxless, cassette-deckless, FM Transmitter-hating people with a beneficial worry-free solution.

A Scanner Darkly


I have been a Philip K. Dick fan for several years now. I have also been a fan of film for even longer than that. I recently have been going to sleep with one of two Richard Linklater films, Waking Life and A Scanner Darkly. I enjoy each movie very much, but I would definitely not be able to compare the two. Though similar in effect, the plots couldn't be more different. Lately, I've been watching A Scanner Darkly. It's almost been every night for two weeks straight. I don't know too many people who have seen this film, aside from those I've shown the film to. I would definitely recommend A Scanner Darkly to anyone who is a Richard Linklater fan, a Philip K. Dick fan or just a fan of my sophisticated opinions. The film will also appeal to those who are interested in drug culture or government conspiracies. It's also one of those films that has a very unique cast. I never imagined a film with Keanu Reeves, Robert Downey, Jr., Winona Rider, Woody Harrelson and Rory Cochrane together, but it definitely aids in the effectiveness of the adaptation from the novel to the screen.